A hedge fund or individual who purchases a sizable portion of a publicly traded company with the intention of altering its management and operations is known as an activist investor.
An activist investor is a person who sees a chance to raise a company’s share price because they think it has potential.
When activist investors find a target, they purchase a sizable portion of the company’s stock, alerting the market to impending changes.
Read More: David Birkenshaw
The announcement that an activist firm has acquired stock in a company may cause its share price to increase.
After that, a shareholder activist will advocate for changes they think are best for the business. These modifications frequently consist of:
Redirecting strategically
Modifications to operational choices
Restructuring capital
Selling subsidiaries and non-core businesses
Management changes
Modifications to corporate governance, such as a new board of directors
Activist investors and private equity firms are not the same.
The goal of activist investing is to generate value for shareholders by bringing about change.
Depending on their objectives, activist investors frequently advise business management, compel a reorganization, or replace the board of directors.
Unlike private equity firms, activist investors almost never buy out companies in order to profit from their sales.
To gain the favor of other shareholders and business executives, they employ both public and private communications.
An activist investor may decide to hold a proxy election to choose new directors and board members if such attempts are unsuccessful.
Do companies benefit or suffer from activist investors?
The long-standing issue of shareholders whose interests don’t always coincide with those of chronic management teams has occasionally been successfully addressed by activist investors.
They have unquestionably added value for both themselves and other shareholders.
However, it is difficult to classify the efficacy of activist investing.
Activists will always prioritize their own interests, and they will always profit if they are successful.
However, activist investors typically concentrate on short-term tactics like dividends and share buybacks that raise the share price rather than making long-term investments.
The positive effects of activist investing
In businesses that are stagnant or poorly run, activist investors can be useful change agents. Through corporate restructuring, they can unlock value and replace ineffective managers.
When an activist investor declares their interest in a company, share prices frequently increase dramatically.
When activist investors are involved, a company’s management is far less likely to disregard shareholder proposals.
Activist investors frequently infuse a stagnant business with enormous potential with new ideas and a new outlook.
The harm that activist investors can do
For activist investors, the long-term outlook isn’t always important. This kind of short-term thinking can be detrimental.
Actor investor pressure to make quick changes to increase shareholder value can sabotage a company’s long-term goals.
Dividends and share buybacks frequently have a positive short-term effect, but in the long run, it might make more sense to put that money into the business.
Since activist investors might not be subject-matter experts in the company’s industry, there is frequently no assurance that their suggested changes will be implemented.
Stock prices may experience downward pressure when activist investors eventually sell their sizable holdings in the public market.
How Proactive Investors Present Their Argument
Activist investors use a variety of tactics to argue their position and influence business decisions. These tactics may consist of:
Public Campaigns: To spread the word about their issues and enlist the help of other shareholders and stakeholders, activists use public forums like the media and social media.
Proxy Battles: In order to gain seats or sway decisions, activists may run for office on boards or suggest shareholder resolutions.
Interacting with Management: In order to express their concerns and suggest different approaches, activists frequently have direct conversations with the company’s board and management.
In severe circumstances, activists may turn to the legal system in order to defend their rights and compel change.
Conclusion
The role of activist investors is crucial in today’s financial environment. Their actions may result in greater accountability, better corporate governance, and higher shareholder value. But it’s crucial to find a balance between activism and businesses’ long-term viability. Through comprehension of activist investors’ incentives, tactics, and possible influence, interested parties can more skillfully traverse this ever-changing terrain.